 The memo, the scores, the debate and the verdict a committee produces about your deal, before you walk into the room. By Chris Tottman, The Founders Corner Read the entire post here. URL for this post. Most founders prepare for the pitch.The deck. The demo. The market slide, rewritten for the fourth time. Then the meeting goes well, the partner is warm, and nothing happens for three weeks. Here is why. The pitch is not the decision. The decision happens days later, in a room you are not in, where the partner who liked you has to stand up in front of four colleagues and defend you against people paid to find the hole. You never see that meeting. You only ever see its output, compressed into two polite sentences. After 25 plus years building companies, backing founders and sitting on the other side of that table, I wanted founders to see the room itself. That is why I built the IC Simulator.  The Founders Corner IC Simulator in 2026: a free AI powered investment committee simulation covering Company and Stage, Traction and Metrics, Product and Problem, Team and Risk, and Unit Economics. No signup. About eight minutes if your numbers are to hand. The six outputs of the IC Simulator: an investment verdict with confidence score, a six dimension score breakdown, a one page IC memo, a five persona committee debate, severity ranked objections and a ranked action plan. Below is the walkthrough, run against a deliberately imperfect deal so you can see what happens when the case has holes in it.
 Step one of the IC Simulator: company name, stage, sector, region, round type & target raise, entered for a Seed stage AI/ML company in APAC raising $1M. This screen looks like admin. It is the frame every other answer gets graded against. There is no such thing as good metrics. There are only metrics that are good for a stage. $500K of ARR is a strong Seed, a weak Series A and an extraordinary pre seed. The number did not move. The frame did. So the first failure appears before you have typed a single metric: founders who select the round they want rather than the round their evidence supports, then receive a cold verdict for reasons that have nothing to do with the business. Set it honestly, then run it twice. Once at the round you want, once at the round below. The gap between the two verdicts is exactly what you are asking a partner to overlook. 2. Traction And Metrics  Only Revenue Status is required, and pre revenue is a recognised, fundable state at Seed. Leave ARR blank if that is the truth.
Then the most valuable thing in this article. These fields are not independent. An associate reads them as a system, and the first thing they do is divide. On my run I entered $500,000 of ARR, 20,000 customers, and an ACV band of $50K to $100K. $500,000 ÷ 20,000 = $25 per customer per year. Against a stated floor of $50,000. Out by a factor of two thousand. The simulator caught it. So would a 24 year old associate, in four minutes, and they would not email you about it. The deal would just stop moving. Before you fill this in, run three divisions on your own deck: ARR over customers, ARR over headcount, and cycle length against ACV. Any answer you cannot explain in one sentence is a problem you will meet later. Read the rest of this post here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |